Autoritären Führerstaat (The Authoritarian Leader Country)
Autoritären Führerstaat
Besides the definition of the state in two forms, namely republic and monarchy, as proposed by Georg Jellinek and by Leon Duguit as mentioned above,
Prof. Otto Koellreutter, whose teaching is based on national-socialism, mentions that there is a species or type when it is called a guided autocracy, or Fuhrerstaat autoritären, or autorithire Leiderstaat.
In the beginning of his description, Prof.Otto Koellreutter mentions the existence of a republic and a monarchy, and for this Prof. Otto Koellreutter is somewhat inclined towards the teachings of Leon Duguit, and in that he says that in conclusion that both republic and monarchy are ruled by a principle, namely that the essence of a monarchy lies in the state ruled by a dynasty, so automatically the appointment or appointment of the head of state uses a system of inheritance from generation to generation, therefore the monarchy is ruled by the principle of inequality, in the sense that those who can and are entitled to occupy the position of head the country is only a family of descendants.
Whereas in a republic it is controlled by the principle of equality, because the appointment or appointment of the head of state here does not use an inheritance system or system. This means that in principle everyone has the right to hold the position of head of state.
Autoritären-Führerstaat state
It is a state led by state power, which is based on the view of state autoritet. So in this country it is also more or less controlled by the principle of inequality, but besides that it is also controlled by the principle of equality, because it is not only people from one dynasty who can hold the power of government in that country.
So it might be said that this state is a mixed form of monarchy and republic, and has monarchical and republican characteristics. It is said to have a monarchical character in the sense that the utoritären-Führerstaat State is also governed by the principle of inequality, it's just that the difference is that the principle of inequality in the autoritären-Führerstaat state means that the appointment or appointment of the head of state does not use the principle that is usually used in appointing or the appointment of the head of state in the republic.
While in addition, it is said to have a republican character in the sense that the Führerstaat autoritären state is also controlled by the principle of equality, it's just that the difference is that the principle of equality in the Führerstaat autoritären country means that the appointment or appointment of the head of state does not use the principle as is usually used in appointment or appointment of heads of state in a monarchical state.
So once again the appointment or appointment of the head of the state autoritären Führerstaat is not the same as the appointment or appointment of a head of state in a monarchy-state or a republican state, but rather based on the view of the state autoritet, based on the ability to govern and the ability to control its people.
Thus, in this Führerstaat autoritären state the difference between the form of monarchy and the form of the republic does not have a major or important meaning, in the sense that neither the principle of inequality nor the principle of equality is put aside. Then if so what principle is used, or what system is it used in the appointment or appointment of the head of state? It seems that Otto Koellreutter did not give a clear explanation on this matter, nor the basis of power than this country.
In this case, Otto Koellreutter only shows Adolph Hitler in his book "Mein Kamft", that is, among other things, Adolph Hitler said that, the goal of the national-socialist movement lies not in establishing a monarchy or establishing a republic, but in creating a German state.
But even so, this explanation has not made the problem clear, because it does not say which formation of the German state was intended. Whereas in the past there were several German countries.
If what is meant by the German state at the time of Hitler, Hitler himself at that time finally chose a kind of plebiscite as a method or system for the appointment or appointment of the head of state, after overthrowing the old head of state, namely Hinderburg, in a Coup d'etat.
